Paste the brand’s email and DealBuff extracts the fee, deliverables, rights, exclusivity, revisions and payment terms. Fixed rules—not the AI—calculate the 0–100 Deal Score, term-adjusted range and counteroffer.
Your payment unlocks one private analysis on your account, so BuzzBuff needs to know which account should receive it.
An illustrative offer — a real brand name would never appear here — analysed end to end. The verdict, the priced terms and the reply are the three things you get.
$3,000 is inside the range for your reach, but you're also being asked for a full year of category exclusivity and permanent ad usage. Priced properly those two clauses are worth about $3,000 on their own — roughly the entire fee.
Hi Dana,
Thanks for this — the product is a good fit for the channel and I'd like to make it work.
Two things in the terms need adjusting before I can say yes. Twelve months of category-wide exclusivity takes me out of the audio space for a year, and perpetual paid-ad usage means the video keeps working for Northmark indefinitely at no further cost. Priced normally, those two clauses are worth more than the fee on the table.
Here's what works: $4,800 for the integration and two shorts, with exclusivity narrowed to headphones only for 3 months and usage rights running 6 months, renewable at 25%. If the budget is fixed at $3,000, I can do that instead with 3-month exclusivity and no whitelisting.
Either version works for me. Let me know which one you'd like and I'll get it in the calendar.
Best,
Marcus
A brand that won't move on exclusivity duration usually will move on its scope. Narrowing "audio" to "headphones" costs them almost nothing and gives you back most of the year.
This analysis is private.
A sponsorship price pays for content. Rights, restrictions and slow payment ask the same fee to do more work or carry more risk, so they need to be read separately.
This MVP starts with the fee in the offer and applies published, fixed term premiums. It is a term-adjusted estimate, not a claim about what every channel should earn.
Organic reposting, paid ads, whitelisting and perpetual use are different permissions. Paid and longer use costs more because the brand keeps earning reach from your work and identity.
Exclusivity removes future deals. Its price depends on duration and scope: a three-month named-competitor list is not the same as a year covering an entire category.
Net-60 payment, no kill fee, missing IP language and unlimited revisions lower the Deal Score. DealBuff flags these as commercial risk without inventing a dollar premium where one is not defensible.
Compare the fee against what a channel your size normally earns for the same deliverables, then price the terms separately. This text MVP handles that second step: it starts with the stated fee and adds fixed adjustments for the rights and restrictions it extracts. It does not yet claim a channel-market benchmark.
DealBuff costs US$9.99 for one private sponsorship analysis. It is a single payment, not a subscription, and each completed purchase unlocks one analysis.
The text is sent to the configured AI provider to extract its terms, but BuzzBuff never stores the pasted text, publishes it or sends it to the brand. If you sign in, only the extracted analysis is saved to private history. There is no public deal result or share card.
No. DealBuff applies commercial pricing assumptions to extracted contract language. It does not decide whether a clause is enforceable and does not know your jurisdiction. Before signing anything you could not walk away from, have a lawyer read it.